 |
| a livery MD80 Aviaco |
"There is no more realistic flight simulator as a flight physical X "Plane"
Inaugurated the simulation section, specifically the X-Plane 9. Like all virtual aviators know, the civilian simulator market has clearly been dominated for years by Microsoft's Flight Simulator, X-Plane being the most direct rival, but always from afar. For the user, each version of X-Plane that came to market was a disappointment. However, coinciding with the closing of the studies that produced the ACES Flight Simulator, the guys from Laminar Research have put the batteries into what the X-Plane about the FS lacked: a full scenario and graphics that breathtaking.
And so was born the version 9 of X-Plane, a visual environment that has nothing to do with previous versions. His scenes, 60Gb, offer some textures from around the world with much higher resolution than Flight Simulator X. In my no doubt gives me the impression of flying over an area much more realistic. Geographic elevations have also been maintained. If anything you could put a snag is that airports lack of buildings, which is working for simuleros development that will undoubtedly make a great work for free so that others can fly High quality at airports.
In return, X-Plane presents us with a beacon and a detail lights on the runway which is unmatched by any other simulator on the market. The truth is it is a pleasure ride and see all these lights with brackets. And we can not forget one very important detail that pilots and simuleros really appreciate a lot: the gradient of the slopes. Farewell to flat tracks!
One of the major differences Flight Simulator graphics engine is that the X-Plane is based on OpenGL. And the result could not be better. At the same quality of graphics and on the same computer, X-Plane is much more fluid than FSX. This section highlights how quickly especially moving the dials, switches and other cockpit instruments, with an amazing realism, as well as the speed with which the program loads the textures of the terrain and the aircraft.
many graphical configuration options we have, there is in common with the FS, which is the ability to adjust the minimum level of frames per second. The difference with Flight Simulator is that if due to overload scenario, the program came down to that limit, X-Plane add a fog effect to hide three-dimensional objects in the distance, thereby maintaining the quality and the minimum level of frames, and avoiding a possible "crash" chart that would leave us hanging. I must say that X-Plane never left me hanging not conflict with a third party software additions. And
addons have to talk because if it is true that X-Plane aircraft lacks high quality it is also true that there are developing projects very, very promising. Among them is a CRJ and Airbus A320 with a realism and graphic detail never seen and we look forward to its release. I will speak to them in future entries in this blog.
In X-Plane 9 has revolutionized the graphics and left intact the essence by this simulator was unveiled: the physics of flight. Currently there are no other civil simulator more realistic in terms of flight physics are concerned that X-Plane. I can assure you that after 18 years with Flight Simulator, I had to "learn" to land again with X-Plane.
In conclusion, I am very happy to finally have an alternative without doubt to the height of Flight Simulator. There are certainly better details, but it is a project with a very good base and above, with a future.
This blog definitely recommend X-Plane 9.
 |
| fluency cockpit instruments is very similar to reality |
 |
| occupy terrain textures are more 60Gb and resolution than the default FSX scenery |
In return, X-Plane presents us with a beacon and a detail lights on the runway which is unmatched by any other simulator on the market. The truth is it is a pleasure ride and see all these lights with brackets. And we can not forget one very important detail that pilots and simuleros really appreciate a lot: the gradient of the slopes. Farewell to flat tracks!
One of the major differences Flight Simulator graphics engine is that the X-Plane is based on OpenGL. And the result could not be better. At the same quality of graphics and on the same computer, X-Plane is much more fluid than FSX. This section highlights how quickly especially moving the dials, switches and other cockpit instruments, with an amazing realism, as well as the speed with which the program loads the textures of the terrain and the aircraft.
 |
| addons that play airports with absolute precision |
addons have to talk because if it is true that X-Plane aircraft lacks high quality it is also true that there are developing projects very, very promising. Among them is a CRJ and Airbus A320 with a realism and graphic detail never seen and we look forward to its release. I will speak to them in future entries in this blog.
 |
| In graphical environment has been greatly improved, with nothing to envy the simulator Microsoft |
In conclusion, I am very happy to finally have an alternative without doubt to the height of Flight Simulator. There are certainly better details, but it is a project with a very good base and above, with a future.
This blog definitely recommend X-Plane 9.
0 comments:
Post a Comment