Can You Get Alopecia On Chin

NO Telecinco -" Is Turning "

intended with this video? "Burn the face of a crew lost some friends? Such can only be news in some brain rotted @ s who call themselves "journalists" and that do nothing but discredit the true professionals in this sector. "It did not cost anything to change the flight number." If I say that Emilio, I operate the face just so that nobody would recognize me with shame. And the draft journalist who recorded the images along with the rest of the team of this "program", perhaps you would like to know that people working in aviation is antetodo professional, educated to do so and he knows his work, which Today, unfortunately, in your world every time there is less and the clearest evidence of this is this "great video" you have done. Congratulations and keep on contributing to fuck you doing television.

Oakley Splice Crowbar

Plane Crash: Reality and Common Sense

"Two thousand seven hundred forty-one people died in traffic accidents and I do not see the media spend three full days and talk shows to address how they should improve road safety. "

has been more than 10 years since that Paukner accident that killed all occupants of the plane after colliding with a mountain on approach to Melilla. From then until the 20th of August not happened in Spain plane crash of such magnitude. This shows clearly that aviation in our country is safe. And maybe that security and that has been so long that we have confused. Let no one be fooled, because flying is safe but accidents do happen and unfortunately the Barajas is not the last. And for any errors occur because the error is a quality human being, and we can not help it.

When a disaster like that experienced in Barajas everyone wants answers and accountability. To the plight of victims, they seek solace in the media because they are the ones who provide information, not realizing that, taking advantage of his weakness, some media bombard them with junk media confusing further. Already, who accuses Spanair terrorist for killing their loved ones. It's terrible.

I would like to restore the people's memory what happened to the Yak 42 which crashed in Turkey in 2003 killing as many English military. Wanted to do an investigation and identification of bodies so fast that eventually handing the family remains were not those of their loved ones. And in this country do not learn. Is there anyone who is able to explain to these poor victims who have lost their relatives, who are being deceived? Spanair is a party involved in the accident and while there is an investigation Open can not comment publicly on the causes of the accident until the end, unfortunately for victims seeking response. Should not fall into the trap of seeking a quick fix, for all job well done takes time. Otherwise it would be much easier to say that the pilot was flying under the influence of alcohol. At the end of the day, the pilot can no longer defend themselves and thus would have a cause that would explain everything. In short, a delusion for fast relief. We have seen in the accident Paukner and Iberia Flight 610 crashed into Mount Oiz of Bilbao in 1985. Thankfully, sanity prevailed in the end and could not be demonstrated in any such nonsense of the two cases.

Barajas Returning to the accident, I personally do not understand why he paints the government in all this if not for politics of the accident. Imitating a comment for Enrique Piñeyro film director Whiskey Romeo Zulu - I would also say that with the knowledge that the President's Office of Aeronautics is understandable that states that the pilot of Flight JK5022 was "ate "Every track on takeoff. Any pilot knows that a planeload of passengers and fuel, rolling down the runway at Barajas at 2.30pm in the heat of August, need more runway to take off that if used in winter and less weight. But the ordinary citizen does not have to know this, and the comments of the Government can lead people to draw wrong conclusions. Eye, do not say that the government lies, it is among the few who have seen the famous video of AENA, but should not intervene in this as the commission of inquiry to clarify what happened.

The same applies to state funerals to be held for the deceased. Is not this a political trap to get to the casualties on their side? I say this with all due respect to those who have lost someone in the tragedy, but for a moment let us apply common sense. In 2007, died on the roads all less than 2,741 people. TWO THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FORTY ONE PEOPLE! Many of these victims were young people driving under the influence of alcohol, that is not just an accident, it's a stupid way to leave this world. Others, in his recklessness took the lives of many innocent people. This is truly tragic, and we see that the media devote three whole days and talk shows to address how it should improve road safety. I do not see that the Government to state funerals that have been innocently killed because of a drunk driver. Could it be that those who died in a plane have more rights than those killed by accident? And if so, why, if we speak of just 200 people in ten years of aviation, when the traffic accident deaths in the thousands in one year?

When passengers board a plane with a "false" sense of security that makes them contemplate the possibility of error, and when tragedy occurs breaks psychosis. But there are those who cause traffic accidents and continues to work with the same recklessness as usual, without revolutionize a country. And then say nonsense doubt about the professionalism of the pilots who train for years to fly, and whose primary value drivers is security. What may a pilot head feel so pressured by his company decided to risk a suicide off a planeload of passengers? Could it be that someone thinks they are aliens from another world who have no family or children waiting at home? "We need much, but common sense.

I hope this incident will serve to make us think that there is help and inform the families of victims as required, by providing all the support they need, explaining in detail the difficult process ahead of them and isolate them from all media speculation that reality is not distorted in the way it has done with the accident Barajas.

Cheap Baton Twirling Costumes

JKK 5022: The Circus of Television

As we all know the story, today I will dedicate myself to make a strong criticism of the media. Since the early hours after the accident, the blast of nonsense in the news outlets not only absolutely absurd but instead of reporting only contribute to further increase confusion and pain of the families of the victims is totally unnecessary.

First I would like to stress that the causes of air accidents occur are many, never a single, and no journalist or pilot nor any company has the ability to say what were the causes of an accident, let alone two hours overdue. For it is the Commission's Air Accident Investigation, part of Civil Aviation under the Ministry of Development.

The MD82 plane crash is manufactured by McDonnell Douglas in the 80 and 90, and has sold thousands of units worldwide. The reason for these airplanes Spanair was replacing old but it was not because compared to the new Airbus, the MD are not profitable in terms of expenditure. If you are unsure as stated in some way, then we can not fly by plane, not because it is an extended plane but because the Jumbos, the rest of the aircraft firm Boeing, Airbus and others have also had accidents in which people have died.


Finally, I would say a commercial airliner does not fall by an engine failure, or by wind gusts that had allegedly Barajas yesterday, and not by the wake turbulence that the plane itself had been an hour earlier in the first abortion-off, which is to be the dumbest thing I have heard in these two days. Everyone is free to speculate what they want, but respect for the families of the victims I would like the media would stop talking nonsense for once and abide by the Civil Aviation reported that they alone have the power to talk about the causes.

Dry White Spots On Dogs Noses

My first flight Ultralight

"[...] the wind in your face, see the whole glass down there without a vacuum that separates you is an immense sensation "

so far, and except for the biplane Bücker, everything that had flown aircraft cabin were closed. The ultralight always caught my attention, perhaps because I am one of those nostalgic pilots who enjoy flying "real" or maybe because I simply I would like to fly and even a broom.

Thanks to some friends back onto the Tango could have two axles and try the wonders of this new aviation unknown to me. Technically always considered the ultralights as "inferior" to the flight of the aircraft misnamed. Nothing is further from the truth. I do not mean to be difficult to fly, but it's another world in some technical aspects that need to change the chip.

As you can see from the photo, the cabin of Tango is not a luxury, but not deceived, if you take away the skin to a general aviation unit will see the same thing. I am struck to see the tires Fuel coming out of the bottles subject to the tubes that make up the carrier. Is narrow but quite comfortable, with seats angled slightly backward, equipped with shoulder harnesses and waist. The carrier is fairing on the front and open at the sides. The instrumentation is quite simple, an anemometer in km / h, an altimeter in meters, tachometers, fuel gauges, switches cut two magnets and a button that activates the starter motor. The controls are duplicated, along with power control. The brake is operated from the hand of the commander.

The launch is quieter than I expected, even I have to say that the wind of the propeller just upset despite having fairly close to us in the top front of the wing. The shooting is just like a normal plane, ie with the pedals. However, the tango has a different characteristic to the other aircraft I've flown, is two axes, ie, has no wings. The warping is done using the rudder, which is moved by the lever as if it were the normal roll control. It is just this point where the pilot used to flying three-axis aircraft have to change the chip. Put the right foot at takeoff to compensate for torque effect is useless. In Tango, your feet become your hands. And do not believe that it is simple catch it at first, especially in the shots.

align at the top, do a quick check of instruments and a briefing. I put the engine at 6,000 rpm and rushed through the grass track Fervenza. John, my instructor, pull the lever and go to air. I admit I slept on my first takeoff, used to other aircraft in which one is checking the engine and speed, in a microlight happens very fast. You put power and in just 4 seconds and you're in the air. Now I try to maintain 80km / h during the climb, but my eyes are inevitably out. How wonderful! It is complicated to explain what you feel the wind in your face, see everything down there without a glass separates you from the vacuum is a great feeling. I have to say that fly over the Fervenza Reservoir is gorgeous with all those islands in the middle. Juan beckons me to reduce to 5,000 rpm and turn over the lake. I look back on my right and see the wing pointing downward, the sensation of vertigo is void, even given the impression that you're going to fall into the void.

Juan instructs me to do traffic circuit and takes off. After a couple of turns and I'm doing with the Tango. Short at 4,000 rpm and start holding down the 80km / h the anemometer. Viro to end at a height that seems more or less adequate. However, the Tango has a glide slope somewhat steeper than normal sport aviation aircraft. Plans, and take on a very small space, but does not travel horizontally as well as other aircraft. I adjusted the alignment to the engine and the speed with the elevator, always at 80km / h. The Tango is very low, you could say that you take your ass land almost flat on the floor, and references are deceiving. Think you're going to take and you're still a tad high when you pull the lever. Me under a balloon in the head, although not very pronounced, we have plenty of speed so a little peak and return to pull gently. John was assisting in the making, because here's another great difficulty, used to correct the runway with the pedals, I did not realize that the nose wheel is still in the air and has no effect on the ground. John pushes the lever forward to touch the door, and I, in the midst of a smile not to have realized that stupid detail, correct shaft, and once stabilized, I put in power again. Four seconds and the ground is down there again. It's amazing how little space that runs to take off.

The second circuit and was much better, although I am so impressed by the sense of "free flight" which gives a apparatus of this type do not go yet before the plane as I wish. The approach was much more stabilized than the first and making quite soft, this time without balloons. John applies brakes and go to the apron. But how?! That's it?! No doubt the 20 minutes that I should be up there I missed a few seconds.

In short, it looks like the stunt in one respect: once you try two things can happen, or reject it completely, or engages you while you do not stop until you try it again. Although very limited equipment and perhaps the aesthetic aspect is not very attractive, the sensation of flying outdoor offering is indescribable. Yes ... always with great head, because despite the appearance of "toy", they are not at all.

I hope soon to tell more stories "of tubing and fabric."

Replacement Light For Outdoor Santa

Mach 1, The Sound Barrier

In the high desert of Mojave there is nothing but dust, fossils, petrified cactus branches, sand storms that cross the air to 42 degrees. In winter, the rains are some pools that appear faint in the curved worms, shrimp-like. Gulls come from the ocean to devour. The Mojave looks like a landscape of ancient geological era. Also is the best runway in the world. In March, any remaining moisture evaporates and vastness that takes a firm surface and polished.

Sixty years ago, two small sheds, a gas station and the canteen of a tanned woman wearing the paradoxical name of Pancho Barnes, formed Muroc Air Base. The pilots had a salary of $ 283 per month and living in bungalows with wire mesh doors battered by freezing winds that night.

The base offered refuge to the test drivers. The aircraft was then a rustic pioneer company and the new invention, a junk lot simple. The X-1 was very small and thin wings, the ship followed the contours of a .50, but looked more like a sausage compact, and the door was identical to the openings to the dogs in the webs of wire. The X-1 was designed to achieve the speed known as Mach 1 (in honor of Ernst Mach sonic research), ie, to break the sound barrier . Some physicists thought that the barrier was a real physical limit and that nothing would come out unscathed from the impact sound. In 1946, Geoffrey de Havilland, son of the famous aeronautical engineer, tried to make the DH 108 was designed by his father arrived Mach 1. The plane and pilot were disintegrated in the attempt. `` The sound barrier was that you could buy a ranch in the sky,''Tom Wolfe wrote in an exceptional non-fiction novel The Right Stuff .

designated driver to crew the X-1 was Slick Goodlin, a cold-blooded man who asked for $ 150 000 out shot the lapis sky. Muroc base was barely money for fuel and eyes turned to a man without imagination to the danger, who spoke broken English and archaic of the Appalachian Mountains and at 18 had changed the overalls by driller uniform pilot: Chuck Yeager.

Sixty years after his suicide flight, Yeager is still unable to see them as little bias as epic. `` Somebody had to do the job,''said before the television interviewers perplexed hope the retired general, who at 74 years continues to fly for pleasure, unravel the mystery of heroism.

Yeager is a kind of magnificent air plumber. Find holes, clean the area, draws an evacuation route. Their responses are those of a craftsman able to see that is about all turns to shit.

At 22, Chuck Yeager participated in the second World War, was wounded in combat and shot down 13 aircraft. At age 24, was ready to fly towards its own annihilation. The only problem is that there was no way to stop it. In its first flights with the X-1 reached Mach 0.9 and 0 0 85 without permission from the base. The final flight was ahead for Tuesday October 14, 1947.

Sunday Yeager got drunk as usual in the canteen of Pancho Barnes and climbed on a horse to graze armadillos in the light of the moon. Fell somewhere in the desert and broke two ribs.

on Tuesday was in the cabin of the X-1, smearing shampoo on board controls to prevent freezing in height, with two broken ribs and a parachute which only served as a mattress. It was hard to reach the door and took a broom to help. Under these conditions up to the sky and produced the sound of which was the first out. `` When the speed reached Mach 1.05-Tom Wolfe writes, "Yeager had the sensation of exceeding the ceiling of the sky. The air took on a deep purple hue and all the stars and the moon came out suddenly, and the sun shone at the same time. Had reached a layer of the upper atmosphere where the air is too thin to contain reflective particles. I was just watching the space. The X-1 approached the top of His ascension and we had seven minutes ... Paradise Flyer. Was faster than any other man in history, everything was almost silent up there, he had exhausted his supply of fuel and was so high in a space so vast that there was little notion of movement. He was master of the sky. It was the loneliness of a king, unique and inviolable, the dome of the world. It would take seven minutes to redirect the path and go down to Muroc.''

Fifty years later, Chuck Yeager, described the scene as if it had never taken off and Tom Wolfe as though it never landed. In the third rock from the sun, the sky is still a mysterious barrier.